Re: [MACCAWS] alt tags? valid code?
Rodrigo Fonseca <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.vkit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 04:56:50PM -0400, kevin c smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we please make an effort to use correct terminology when we're > discussing these matters? Alt isn't a tag, it's an attribute. (X)HTML > isn't code, it's markup. If we run around urging people to 'code to > standards', we lose credibility right off the bat. The 'kit' certainly > can't contain these kinds of errors. Sorry, Kevin. Guess we all know that but this is a brain storm, kinda loose discussion, some details may scape our attention. The documents will be revised so that kind of error don't show up. It's really confusing to people and using proper terminology sometimes is overlooked. See, I work every day with people that say HTML is a programming language, border is a "tag" for table, etc. Even in our resumes we *need* to put HTML, XHTML and so forth in the "programming experience" because everyone, except developers, think they are programming languages. You just get used to it, sadly. A *lot* of times, people ask me: "Are you an HTML programmer?" and I'd say: "Yes." Most of the contracts I get, the management people ask me if I know cutting edge technology like "CSS programming and XML programming". If I stop an interview to explain the differences, I'd loose the contract. Sad, but my online resume has CSS, XML in the same place as Perl, C++, Delphi... :( -- []'s Rodrigo "Vega" Fonseca.