[MACCAWS] browsers? No, user agents.
Tom Dell'Aringa <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.vkit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In the abstract for the W3Cs WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) you read this: "The primary goal of these guidelines is to promote accessibility. However, following them will also make Web content more available to all users, whatever user agent they are using (e.g., desktop browser, voice browser, mobile phone, automobile-based personal computer, etc.) or constraints they may be operating under (e.g., noisy surroundings, under- or over-illuminated rooms, in a hands-free environment, etc.)." I like the fact that they don't restrict the conversation to *browsers*, and we tend to always talk in terms of browsers. Not only is this good for accessibility, but it looks toward more innovative technologies like PDAs, WAP phones and the like. I think that if we talk in terms of *user agents* and not *browsers*, the message might resonate a little better and might separate a bit from the white noise that is the "browser wars." Tom ===== var me = tom.pixelmech.webDeveloper(); http://www.pixelmech.com/ http://www.maccaws.com/ [Making A Commercial Case for Adopting Web Standards] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com