RE: [MACCAWS] browsers? No, user agents.

> True, you both have a point, especially about Kleenex. (and Xerox too
> I guess.)

Your point is valid.. especially the:

> separate a bit from the white noise that is the "browser wars"

.. portion, however still I'm not sure it would be worth the effort to try
to convince a business to adopt that terminology.

Example
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Dev: "As you can see, this new design would
	be suited to a wider range of user-agents"

Biz: ".. whoa whoa whoa.. backup..
	what's that again?"

Dev: "User-agent? It was defined in the outline I
	wrote based off the research from those wonderful
	MACCAWS fellows"

Biz: "Still not quite getting it.."

Dev: "*sigh* .. It's a web browser."

Biz: "OHHH.. Why didn't you say that! ..continue.."