Re: [MACCAWS] browsers? No, user agents.

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.vkit
Message-ID <[email protected]>
So has anyone got a tame suit or two that we can test the phraseology on when we have some more structure (and possibly alternatives)? I have such people who will review document styles for me if I ask them.

Or do we go for what WE think - and trust our own convictions?  There's enough brains round here to make it right enough to have an effect as long as we can get the documents to the right people. I say let the editorial team produce some arguments/documents and ask the rest of us hoi-polloi for opinions - I'm sure they'll gt lots!! :-)

John

>  from:    MJ Ray <[email protected]>
>  subject: Re: [MACCAWS] browsers? No, user agents.
> I think it's much better to talk about interoperability and such things that
seems to give "suits" an exceptional feeling of well-being without having to
feed pigeons in the park.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.