Re: [MACCAWS] browsers? No, user agents.
"Jon Dillon" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.vkit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I think there are a lot of good arguments being made on both sides, but the > deciding factor should be user testing. Why don't we put this decision off > until we can test some of the early documents? I mean, if we simply cannot > make "user agent" mean anything to the typical client, then it doesn't make > sense for us to use it. If we find that several different terms are equally > effective, then we can fire this debate back up. I think this is an excellent idea. Let's see how it works in practice, and how well the "suits" like it. ;-) A little joke there... Hehe. Jonathan Dillon