Re: [MACCAWS] Fwd: Re: [thelist] XHTML 1.1 and content type

--- "Rick [Kitty5]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thats one part of the XHTML1.1 standard I am prepred to ignore, I
> dont thing
> there are going to be any real world issure relating to it being
> delivered
> as text/html. It will either be displayed as HTML (not a bad thing)
> or the
> user agent will be standards aware enough to recogine it from the
> doctype
> and do whatever it would do differently (if anything)
> 
> Rick

The more I am reading about the troubles with XHTML 1.1, I'm not sure
we want to go further than 1.0 for an XHTML recommendation at this
point (to be discussed of course.) It seems to me a lot of people I
talk to that are using XHTML and CSS, still avoid 1.1

Tom

=====
var me = tom.pixelmech.webDeveloper();

http://www.pixelmech.com/
http://www.maccaws.com/
[Making A Commercial Case for Adopting Web Standards]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com