RE: [MACCAWS] eye candy sites (was web standards..)
Tom Dell'Aringa <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.vkit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Tony Crockford <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Where are the real impressive sites that use CSS? I see some nice > 3 > > layout sites. But where are the TRULY impressive CSS sites...I > > seriously would like to see them. > > > > I think this is one of those chicken and egg scenarios. > > we all know that creating standards compliant sites without using > tables > is hard work. > > We all know that the hard work is worth it. > > Until we can prove that to the people paying for the truly eye > grabbing > sites you won't see any. > > since it's mostly web developers that produce trick sites without > tables > and using pure CSS there are few designery elements. Yep, I think you are right - and Chris K made a similar posts with some good thoughts (and a nice article). It does make sense. Frankly, I can't wait to see some people push the envelope. I wish I had the time. Anyway, as regards to our initiative, this is why we need to have our gray areas. Tom ===== var me = tom.pixelmech.webDeveloper(); http://www.pixelmech.com/ http://www.maccaws.com/ [Making A Commercial Case for Adopting Web Standards] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com