RE: [MACCAWS] eye candy sites (was web standards..)

Tom Dell'Aringa <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.vkit
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- Tony Crockford <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Where are the real impressive sites that use CSS? I see some nice
> 3
> > layout sites. But where are the TRULY impressive CSS sites...I
> > seriously would like to see them.
> >
> 
> I think this is one of those chicken and egg scenarios.
> 
> we all know that creating standards compliant sites without using
> tables
> is hard work.
> 
> We all know that the hard work is worth it.
> 
> Until we can prove that to the people paying for the truly eye
> grabbing
> sites you won't see any.
> 
> since it's mostly web developers that produce trick sites without
> tables
> and using pure CSS there are few designery elements.

Yep, I think you are right - and Chris K made a similar posts with
some good thoughts (and a nice article). It does make sense. Frankly,
I can't wait to see some people push the envelope. I wish I had the
time.

Anyway, as regards to our initiative, this is why we need to have our
gray areas. 

Tom

=====
var me = tom.pixelmech.webDeveloper();

http://www.pixelmech.com/
http://www.maccaws.com/
[Making A Commercial Case for Adopting Web Standards]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com