More issues with the IRP tests

Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:14:03 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.voice
Message-ID <507F61F3-92E4-4A38-BF3A-8C5014C3C0C2@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
- test446.txt[1] is a 404
You can use [2] to check for 404s (though with 1s delay between links)

- test520 has the content in <content> already urlencoded, which will lead to an urlencoded urlencoding:
'this%20is%20some%20content’ -> 'this%2520is%2520some%2520content’ (% is escaped as %25)

What is needed is:
  <content>this is some content</content>
...
  <transition event="HTTP.POST" cond="_event.raw.search(/this%20is%20some%20content/) !== -1" target="pass”/>

And I’d like to add

  <transition event="HTTP.POST" cond="_event.raw.search(/this+is+some+content/) !== -1" target="pass”/>

as ‘+’ is a valid escaping for ‘ ‘ as well.

If this is corrected, we pass all tests but 579 with the history transitions and I will submit yet another updated IRP report.

Best regards
  Stefan

[1] http://www.w3.org/Voice/2013/scxml-irp/446/test446.txt
[2] http://validator.w3.org/checklink