More issues with the IRP tests
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:14:03 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.voice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <507F61F3-92E4-4A38-BF3A-8C5014C3C0C2@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
- test446.txt[1] is a 404 You can use [2] to check for 404s (though with 1s delay between links) - test520 has the content in <content> already urlencoded, which will lead to an urlencoded urlencoding: 'this%20is%20some%20content’ -> 'this%2520is%2520some%2520content’ (% is escaped as %25) What is needed is: <content>this is some content</content> ... <transition event="HTTP.POST" cond="_event.raw.search(/this%20is%20some%20content/) !== -1" target="pass”/> And I’d like to add <transition event="HTTP.POST" cond="_event.raw.search(/this+is+some+content/) !== -1" target="pass”/> as ‘+’ is a valid escaping for ‘ ‘ as well. If this is corrected, we pass all tests but 579 with the history transitions and I will submit yet another updated IRP report. Best regards Stefan [1] http://www.w3.org/Voice/2013/scxml-irp/446/test446.txt [2] http://validator.w3.org/checklink