RE: More issues with the IRP tests

Fixed, I think.

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Radomski [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 4:14 PM
To: [email protected] ([email protected])
Subject: More issues with the IRP tests

- test446.txt[1] is a 404
You can use [2] to check for 404s (though with 1s delay between links)

- test520 has the content in <content> already urlencoded, which will lead to an urlencoded urlencoding:
'this%20is%20some%20content' -> 'this%2520is%2520some%2520content' (% is escaped as %25)

What is needed is:
  <content>this is some content</content> ...
  <transition event="HTTP.POST" cond="_event.raw.search(/this%20is%20some%20content/) !== -1" target="pass"/>

And I'd like to add

  <transition event="HTTP.POST" cond="_event.raw.search(/this+is+some+content/) !== -1" target="pass"/>

as '+' is a valid escaping for ' ' as well.

If this is corrected, we pass all tests but 579 with the history transitions and I will submit yet another updated IRP report.

Best regards
  Stefan

[1] http://www.w3.org/Voice/2013/scxml-irp/446/test446.txt
[2] http://validator.w3.org/checklink