Re: Paste-o in spec?

You are right. The ':' should be removed. I think that the rewording you suggest also makes sense, so I will change it in the next draft. 
Jim



> On Oct 20, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Elvis Stansvik <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> From "3.11 Legal State Configurations and Specifications":
> 
> "In a conformant SCXML document, there is an additional requirement on the value of the 'initial' attribute of a <state> and on the 'target' of a <transition> inside an <initial> element: or <history> pseudo-state; all the states must be descendants of the containing <state> or <parallel> element."
> 
> I'm not a native speaker, but is perhaps the ':' a left-over from a previous version where the "or <history> pseudo-state" was not present? I think it should maybe be removed?
> 
> Maybe also re-word it as "inside an <initial> or <history> element"?
> 
> Elvis