Re: The way Apache is restarted and the WO adaptor & MacOSX 10.3 Server deployement

Pierre,

Before upgrading to 10.3, were you using JDK 1.3.1 or 1.4.1 on 10.2? 
I'm trying to determine if this might also be JVM related.

Chuck


Pierre Frisch wrote:

> I have the same experience except that I can pin point it to 10.3 and WO 
> 5.2.2. Nothing has changed on that box except the version of the OS and 
> WO. It was perfectly stable with 10.2.8 and WO 5.2.1 and I had to 
> upgrade it so that we can deploy our new developments... This was done 
> in November and since I have no way of managing that machine properly. 
> The monitor lose connection with wotaskd or come back with the too many 
> files open message. I can never start and stop instances. Sometime I 
> manage to get the box running a bit longer by restarting WO. There is a 
> script to do this in /System/Library/StartupItems/WebObjects but it is 
> broken, I have posted the corrected one a week ago.
> 
> The worse is that whenever I need to restart an instance the only 
> solution is to reboot the machine. Not good.
> 
> We manufacture a product (www.spearcat.com) based on WebObjects and we 
> need to support MacOS 10.3 for our customer but this is not looking good.
> 
> Pierre
> -- 
> Pierre Frisch
> sPearWay Ltd.
> sPearCat Web Catalogs, the flexibility of custom design, the price of a 
> package.
> http://www.spearcat.com/
> 
> 
> On Jan 9, 2004, at 10:25, Will Scheidegger wrote:
> 
>> Stefan, Laura
>>
>> Our setup on a pretty old G4 has been running pretty stable for quite 
>> some while. And it's not easy to say exactly when things started to 
>> get ugly. We continuously installed more apps on the server, but the  
>> the processor is still more than 75% idle. Fact is that our apps 
>> become unavailable quite often now although they're still up and 
>> running. Sometimes the wo adaptor acts up (we think this started when 
>> we activated mod_rewrite on one of our sites) and more recently 
>> wotaskd seems to go crazy. But...
>> - we could not track down to problem yet
>> - we did not find a proper way to restart WO without restarting the 
>> whole box
>> - every time we think we might have found a symptom (like too many 
>> CLOSE_WAIT connections listed by the lsof command) it turns out that 
>> we cannot use it to reliably watch the server...
>> - in short: We have no clue how to resolve these problems.
>>
>> We decided quite a while ago that we wanted "real" server hardware and 
>> that we would go with Solaris (our other servers are already SUN 
>> boxes). So it's not just the recent problems with WO deployment that 
>> drove us to that decision.
>>
>> As I said before: I really would like to have a couple of Xserve four 
>> our deployment, but it's not really what we need and when it comes to 
>> deployment I have to respect other opinions to in our company ;-)
>>
>> -Will
>>
>> On Friday, January 9, 2004, at 06:06 PM, Stefan Apelt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Will,
>>>
>>> your mail from 09.01.2004, 17:47:
>>>
>>>> Damn! We just bought a Sun server because we gave up on WebObjects on
>>>> MacOS X Server because of problems like the one you're describing. Now
>>>> you're telling us that wotaskd / wo adaptor is flunky on Solaris too?
>>>> Very encouraging. I think I'll move to Tomcat!
>>>
>>>
>>> I  don't  know about the differences in JVM implementation for Solaris
>>> vs.  MacOS  vs. Linux. We have Linux 2.4.x+Java 1.4.x+WO 5.2.x running
>>> for around a year now and wotaskd never made problems (1 web server, 2
>>> app  servers,  1 db server, ~20 apps, ~50 instances, lots of requests,
>>> servers  are  connected  via switched Gigabit ethernet). I did not try
>>> JDK  1.3.1  on  Linux  but  with 1.4, it works very well. I don't know
>>> about Linux on Sun either, for that matter. :)
>>>
>>> By  the  way,  we almost never restart Apache nor wotaskd (well, three
>>> times  a year or so for upgrading). Is this really necessary? Or could
>>> it  be a performance or timing issue, eg. that you have a slow network
>>> connection  between servers, broken cable, poorly written network card
>>> driver or something like that which drives wotaskd crazy? In that case
>>> a new server might not help much...
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Regards,
>>>  Stefan
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WebObjects-admin mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-admin
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WebObjects-admin mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-admin

-- 

Chuck Hill                                 [email protected]
Global Village Consulting Inc.             http://www.global-village.net

Progress is the mother of all problems.
- G. K. Chesterton