Re: The way Apache is restarted and the WO adaptor & MacOSX 10.3 Server deployement

I wonder if they did not fix the problem that made them recommend 
using 1.3.1 with wotaskd.  That is another path for investigation.

Sigh.

Chuck


Pierre Frisch wrote:

> Before the upgrade my applications were running with JDK 1.4.1 but 
> wotaskd and monitor were running with 1.3.1 I did make the modification 
> in these to force 1.3.1 as recommended by Apple.
> 
> Pierre
> -- 
> Pierre Frisch
> sPearWay Ltd.
> sPearCat Web Catalogs, the flexibility of custom design, the price of a 
> package.
> http://www.spearcat.com/
> 
> 
> On Jan 9, 2004, at 10:57, Chuck Hill wrote:
> 
>> Pierre,
>>
>> Before upgrading to 10.3, were you using JDK 1.3.1 or 1.4.1 on 10.2? 
>> I'm trying to determine if this might also be JVM related.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>> Pierre Frisch wrote:
>>
>>> I have the same experience except that I can pin point it to 10.3 and 
>>> WO 5.2.2. Nothing has changed on that box except the version of the 
>>> OS and WO. It was perfectly stable with 10.2.8 and WO 5.2.1 and I had 
>>> to upgrade it so that we can deploy our new developments... This was 
>>> done in November and since I have no way of managing that machine 
>>> properly. The monitor lose connection with wotaskd or come back with 
>>> the too many files open message. I can never start and stop 
>>> instances. Sometime I manage to get the box running a bit longer by 
>>> restarting WO. There is a script to do this in 
>>> /System/Library/StartupItems/WebObjects but it is broken, I have 
>>> posted the corrected one a week ago.
>>> The worse is that whenever I need to restart an instance the only 
>>> solution is to reboot the machine. Not good.
>>> We manufacture a product (www.spearcat.com) based on WebObjects and 
>>> we need to support MacOS 10.3 for our customer but this is not 
>>> looking good.
>>> Pierre
>>> -- 
>>> Pierre Frisch
>>> sPearWay Ltd.
>>> sPearCat Web Catalogs, the flexibility of custom design, the price of 
>>> a package.
>>> http://www.spearcat.com/
>>> On Jan 9, 2004, at 10:25, Will Scheidegger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stefan, Laura
>>>>
>>>> Our setup on a pretty old G4 has been running pretty stable for 
>>>> quite some while. And it's not easy to say exactly when things 
>>>> started to get ugly. We continuously installed more apps on the 
>>>> server, but the  the processor is still more than 75% idle. Fact is 
>>>> that our apps become unavailable quite often now although they're 
>>>> still up and running. Sometimes the wo adaptor acts up (we think 
>>>> this started when we activated mod_rewrite on one of our sites) and 
>>>> more recently wotaskd seems to go crazy. But...
>>>> - we could not track down to problem yet
>>>> - we did not find a proper way to restart WO without restarting the 
>>>> whole box
>>>> - every time we think we might have found a symptom (like too many 
>>>> CLOSE_WAIT connections listed by the lsof command) it turns out that 
>>>> we cannot use it to reliably watch the server...
>>>> - in short: We have no clue how to resolve these problems.
>>>>
>>>> We decided quite a while ago that we wanted "real" server hardware 
>>>> and that we would go with Solaris (our other servers are already SUN 
>>>> boxes). So it's not just the recent problems with WO deployment that 
>>>> drove us to that decision.
>>>>
>>>> As I said before: I really would like to have a couple of Xserve 
>>>> four our deployment, but it's not really what we need and when it 
>>>> comes to deployment I have to respect other opinions to in our 
>>>> company ;-)
>>>>
>>>> -Will
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, January 9, 2004, at 06:06 PM, Stefan Apelt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Will,
>>>>>
>>>>> your mail from 09.01.2004, 17:47:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Damn! We just bought a Sun server because we gave up on WebObjects on
>>>>>> MacOS X Server because of problems like the one you're describing. 
>>>>>> Now
>>>>>> you're telling us that wotaskd / wo adaptor is flunky on Solaris too?
>>>>>> Very encouraging. I think I'll move to Tomcat!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I  don't  know about the differences in JVM implementation for Solaris
>>>>> vs.  MacOS  vs. Linux. We have Linux 2.4.x+Java 1.4.x+WO 5.2.x running
>>>>> for around a year now and wotaskd never made problems (1 web server, 2
>>>>> app  servers,  1 db server, ~20 apps, ~50 instances, lots of requests,
>>>>> servers  are  connected  via switched Gigabit ethernet). I did not try
>>>>> JDK  1.3.1  on  Linux  but  with 1.4, it works very well. I don't know
>>>>> about Linux on Sun either, for that matter. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> By  the  way,  we almost never restart Apache nor wotaskd (well, three
>>>>> times  a year or so for upgrading). Is this really necessary? Or could
>>>>> it  be a performance or timing issue, eg. that you have a slow network
>>>>> connection  between servers, broken cable, poorly written network card
>>>>> driver or something like that which drives wotaskd crazy? In that case
>>>>> a new server might not help much...
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>  Stefan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> WebObjects-admin mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-admin
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> WebObjects-admin mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-admin
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Chuck Hill                                 [email protected]
>> Global Village Consulting Inc.             http://www.global-village.net
>>
>> Progress is the mother of all problems.
>> - G. K. Chesterton
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 

Chuck Hill                                 [email protected]
Global Village Consulting Inc.             http://www.global-village.net

Progress is the mother of all problems.
- G. K. Chesterton