Tapestry
Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On May 21, 2005, at 10:27 PM, Mark F. Murphy wrote:
> At 3:38 PM -0300 5/21/05, Alejandro M. Ramallo wrote:
>> Today, after 3 years of development we are convinced that WOF is
>> superior than Tapestry in terms of productivity and reuse (we came
>> out with our own framework as you might suspect). In terms of what
>> you can produce with each tool I am confident that they are both
>> equally effective.
>
> I'm confused.
>
> You're convinced that WO is superior than Tapestry in terms of
> productivity and reuse, but in terms of what you can produce with each
> too you're confident they are both equally effective?
If anybody cares, here is my take on Tapestry ... fresh from a recent
project. On a scale from "1" to "10" ("1" being JSP/Struts, "10" -
WebObjects), Tapestry gets around "7".
http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/2005/05/22/
Andrus