Re: WebObjects 4.5 to 5.x migration: benefits, experiences, advices
Chuck Hill <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 1, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Francis Labrie wrote: > Hi, > > > Chuck Hill wrote: >> It's been a few years, but I don't think that WO is more stable or >> manageable now than it was in 4.5 days. In fact, I would say that it >> is less stable and manageable. Still on OS X 10.3 with WO 5.2.3 it >> is quite OK. I don't recall any real speed problems or benefits in >> converting to Java. I do recall that it took me longer to write Java >> code to achieve the same functionality. > > > So you are referencing WebObjects 4.5 modules coded in Objective-C, > isn't it? > Yes. I'd forgotten that some people code in Java when they are not forced to. :-P > Our customer runs Java coded WebObjects 4.5 applications and > frameworks. I think the combination of JVM 1.1.8 and the Java to > Objective-C bridge is far slower and less stable than pure > Objective-C. Did you migrate such Java WO 4.5 to WO 5? If it's the > case, did you feel better performance and stability? > I think there was one, but I don't recall how bad it was. But if I was using Java in 4.5 I would RUN to 5.2.3! -- Practical WebObjects - a book for intermediate WebObjects developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects, or those who are trying to solve specific application development problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects