Re: Side effect of OSX on Intel announcement
Giulio Cesare Solaroli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Pierce, we are still using WebObjects 4.5.1 (objective-C), and we are stuck with Jaguar (MacOS 10.2.x). Have you been able to run any WebObjects-ObjC applications on Panther/Tiger too? I would be very interested in knowing how did you achieve that, as we are worried abount the current Apple hardware not beeing able to run MacOS 10.2. For the definitive "exit" strategy we are closely looking at SOPE (http://sope.opengroupware.org/en/), that seems to be able to easily replace the WebObject.framework. For the EOF stuff things are more complex, but it looks like GDL2 is still under active (but not astonishing fast) development. Thanks for your attention. Best regards, Giulio Cesare Solaroli On 6/8/05, Pierce T. Wetter III <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We're still on 4.5, we've just been steadily patching it for each > new release of OSX. > > I just realized that a side effect of the OSX on Intel announcement > is that we'll have to either move to Java or GnuStepWeb. > > Anyone else in the same boat? > > Pierce > _______________________________________________ > WebObjects-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk >