Re: WO bug fixes

Chuck Hill <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Aug 2, 2005, at 6:46 AM, John Pollard wrote:

> Just out of interest, do people see WO bugs they report to Apple being 
> fixed?

Yes.  Not all, but some.


>  I expect some people are treated with higher priority?

The more people that report a bug, the more likely it is to be fixed.


> Over the last few years I have filed perhaps 10 bugs. Some of my 
> earlier reports just vanished.

Were they fixed?  My fixed ones are gone, IIRC.


> I can now see 5 on radarweb, all Open. I have been contacted once or 
> twice with further questions, but have never seen one of my bug 
> reports marked as resolved!
>
> My top bug is that asking for requests to be handled concurrently for 
> a Java Client application server side is apparently ignored. I am sure 
> this was working a few releases ago. I suppose I shouldn't hold my 
> breath.
>
I don't think that a lot of people use JC and there are a lot of JC 
related bugs.  Probably not a lot of people report that bug so it gets 
a low priority.  If you are asking for concurrent dispatch of requests 
from a single client (session) that probably won't ever happen.  WO 
serializes requests by session.

Chuck

-- 
Practical WebObjects - a book for intermediate WebObjects developers 
who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects, or those 
who are trying to solve specific application development problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.