Re: WO bug fixes

Thanks Chuck, I expect some of the bugs I reported were fixed but the cases 
not marked as closed. I am hoping for concurrent processing of requests 
from different sessions, not within the same session. I did have it working 
some time ago as I got some strange effects of mixed data before I 
synchronized certain sections of code. Now the settings seem to be ignored 
by WO as a second short JC request (different session) always queues up 
behind the greedy long one. Come on everyone, use this great JC technology 
and demand concurrency!

At 19:42 02/08/2005, Chuck Hill wrote:

>>My top bug is that asking for requests to be handled concurrently for a 
>>Java Client application server side is apparently ignored. I am sure this 
>>was working a few releases ago. I suppose I shouldn't hold my breath.
>I don't think that a lot of people use JC and there are a lot of JC 
>related bugs.  Probably not a lot of people report that bug so it gets a 
>low priority.  If you are asking for concurrent dispatch of requests from 
>a single client (session) that probably won't ever happen.  WO serializes 
>requests by session.