WO vs. 4D

Dear WO Lists,

We need to know why WO is a much better solution than 4D for  
developing/deploying web-based applications. Since we are a pure WO  
shop and have no experience with 4D, it would be nice to get some  
insights from those that do have some experience with 4D as well as  
WO - for a fair comparison. We are proposing WO to an all mac-based  
client who is currently using 4D. They, however, prefer to web-enable  
their applications - still - using 4D. WO is always known to be  
faster, better, and more cost-effective; but we need to convince them  
why.

Thank you for your information.


With Kind Regards,

Dennis Gaastra, M.B.A.[sfu.ca], B.Sc.[ubc.ca]
Chief Technology Officer,

WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc.
HQ:  (+1) 604.921.1333
Fax:  (+1) 604.921.4313
Cell:  (+1) 604.787.2532
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.webappz.com & www.1tracker.com