Re: Ruby on Rails vs. WebObjects
"Geoff Hopson" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:57:09 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There was a discussion on this last October http://wodeveloper.com/omniLists/webobjects-talk/2005/October/mailthrds.html#00005 Some pertinent opints there. Geoff On 28/02/06, Karl J. Kuehn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Brendan Duddridge wrote: > > > Does anyone have any experience developing large scale WebObjects > > applications vs. large scale Ruby on Rails applications? We've been > > developing WO apps for a long time, but WO seems to have stalled > > for the past while whereas Ruby on Rails seems to have some > > momentum to it. The AJAX libraries in Ruby on Rails looks interesting. > > With only limited experience with both platforms my impression is > that for smaller projects (everything lives on one server, for > instance) that RoR is probably a quicker way of going if you want > full control. WebObjects Direct-to-Web is probably even faster, but > you wind up hitting the wall where customization start to take you > into a full WO application pretty quickly. > On the other hand, if you are looking for a full blown application > that needs a cluster of computers to run, and has the ability to be a > web service, or a Java application (desktop) the WebObjects really > starts to shine. I do hope that Apple continues to develop > WebObjects, and uses CoreData as a project to extend it to small > scale applications as well (the two are conceptually similar, but my > understanding is that that is where the similarity ends).. > > Karl Kuehn > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > WebObjects-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk >