RE: Ruby on Rails vs. WebObjects
"Bruce Fancher" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:27:41 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <015201c63c8c$477c6320$630fa8c0@deadlord> |
Yes. And I'd just like to point out that I started that thread. Why? I'd like to say it was because of my amazing creativity and intelligence, but in fact, it was due to my deep insight and vision. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geoff Hopson Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 11:57 AM To: Karl J. Kuehn Cc: webobjects-talk; Brendan Duddridge Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails vs. WebObjects There was a discussion on this last October http://wodeveloper.com/omniLists/webobjects-talk/2005/October/mailthrds.html #00005 Some pertinent opints there. Geoff On 28/02/06, Karl J. Kuehn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Brendan Duddridge wrote: > > > Does anyone have any experience developing large scale WebObjects > > applications vs. large scale Ruby on Rails applications? We've been > > developing WO apps for a long time, but WO seems to have stalled for > > the past while whereas Ruby on Rails seems to have some momentum to > > it. The AJAX libraries in Ruby on Rails looks interesting. > > With only limited experience with both platforms my impression > is that for smaller projects (everything lives on one server, for > instance) that RoR is probably a quicker way of going if you want full > control. WebObjects Direct-to-Web is probably even faster, but you > wind up hitting the wall where customization start to take you into a > full WO application pretty quickly. > On the other hand, if you are looking for a full blown > application that needs a cluster of computers to run, and has the > ability to be a web service, or a Java application (desktop) the > WebObjects really starts to shine. I do hope that Apple continues to > develop WebObjects, and uses CoreData as a project to extend it to > small scale applications as well (the two are conceptually similar, > but my understanding is that that is where the similarity ends).. > > Karl Kuehn > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > WebObjects-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk > _______________________________________________ WebObjects-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk