RE: Open source WO - offer
"Bruce Fancher" <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:24:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004f01c6cf8e$a06b2580$6301a8c0@deadlord> |
Sure, and where is the open source operating system that has the power and elegance of MacOS X? Or the open source database that has the performance and feature set of Oracle? The differences, of course, being that: 1) Apple and Oracle each invests heavily in developing and marketing those products, whereas it's been years since anything other than the occasionaly bug fix was added to WebObjects. 2) Despite increasing competition from Linux, MySQL, Postgres, etc. there is still a big market for closed source operating systems and databases. This is increasingly not the case web development application tools. The momementum is towards open source solutions like some combination of Spring, Tapestry, JSF, Hibernate, Cayenne, Tomcat, JBoss, etc. WebLogic and WebSphere are still out there, but a) both IBM and BEA offer a whole other set of software and services on top of what WebObjects provides out of the box and b) Apple can't compete with IBM and BEA in selling into the market that buys those products. Granted, I'd rather develop with WebObjects than WebSphere or WebLogic any day of the week, but that market generally seems to feel differently. So the question isn't: should WebObjects be a proprietary solution that has a resonable level of investment in its marketing and development or should it be open source? The question is: should WebObjects be open source or should it effectively be dead? Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Georg Tuparev [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 4:09 AM To: Bruce Fancher Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Open source WO - offer Bruce, Let me put your question in a different way. Where is the open source equivalent of EOF with the same elegance etc? g On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Bruce Fancher wrote: > Can you give us any examples of an open source project where this has > happened? I don't mean a crap open source project, there are > plenty of > those, I mean a good piece of software that was ruined by the > "unwashed > masses fiddling with it." Just because a project is open source > doesn't > mean anyone can show up and make changes to the main source tree, or > appropriate the name of the project. Georg Tuparev Tuparev Technologies Klipper 13 1186 VR Amstelveen The Netherlands Mobile: +31-6-55798196