Re: State of Windows deployment in 2009?

On 25/11/2009, at 8:20 AM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote:

> This is funny; however, from our experience, Apple does actually =
listen to us, and showing them an "i don't care" attitude will most =
likely result in us being stuck with 5.4.3 & Wonder, and Apple keeping =
WebObjects to themselves,

This makes no sense to me. If they[1] *did* listen[2] then they'd have =
released WO 5.4.3.1 and 5.5 by now because that's what people have been =
asking about for quite some time. In fact, they tested the waters with =
quasi nightly builds ... but internal politics has seen the end of that.

> and we'll never be synchronized with the latest and greatest Apple =
versions again, because we think we can all do it on our own. Very =
smart.

The community has arisen in response to Apple pulling back (e.g., Entity =
Modeler was written because of Apple's decision to pull the tools). =
You've got it backwards I'm afraid.

> With Kind Regards,
>=20
> Dennis Gaastra,=20


[1] by 'they' we mean Apple Computer Inc.
[2] I know the WO devs at Apple themselves listen as I've had private =
conversations with a few of them and have had very good responses. They =
simply can't overcome internal politics.

> On 2009-11-24, at 12:04 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
>=20
>> Jesus. Apple will do what they want. Nothing you, I or anybody else =
says or does will make much of a difference. Nor should we really care, =
it's not like they did something useful in the last 5 years or so.
>>=20
>> You sound like they were some sort of rain god. "Let's show we are =
loyal, or else HE might smite us like the flies we are!"
>>=20
>> Cheers, Anjo
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Am 24.11.2009 um 20:36 schrieb Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists:
>>=20
>>> If we want Apple  to release new WebObjects versions, beyond 5.4.3, =
to the community, the worst thing we can do is talking about Windows and =
Linux. We should be very clear about this: if we expect Apple to do =
anything for us in the regard, we should be loyal to Apple by only =
developing and deploying on Apple equipment. Otherwise, I am afraid that =
5.4.3 will be the last version we will ever see...
>>>=20
>>> With Kind Regards,
>>>=20
>>> Dennis Gaastra,=20
>>> Chief Technology Officer,
>>> WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only =
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should =
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the =
sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake =
and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be =
guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be =
intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or =
contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any =
errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a =
result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please =
request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc., 726 - 1489 Marine =
Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, www.webappz.com
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On 2009-11-24, at 10:19 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> 1) The customer sometimes is willing to compromise and give you a =
Linux box ... deployment on Linux is as easy as Mac more-or-less. So, if =
they won't let you use Mac, ask if you can use Linux.... and setup =
CentOS or RHEL on it.
>>>>=20
>>>> 2) Project Wonder has source for Adaptors. I see IIS adaptor source =
in there. No idea how good it is:
>>>>=20
>>>> 	/Wonder/Utilities/Adaptors/IIS/
>>>>=20
>>>> HTH, Kieran
>>>>=20
>>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Ralph Scheuer wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> due to the fact that some of our customers use Windows servers, I =
would be interested how others deploy their WO apps on Windows these =
days...
>>>>>=20
>>>>> The wiki only refers to Apache when it comes to WO 5.4 on Windows =
and does not mention IIS...
>>>>>=20
>>>>> However, some customers need specific IIS features like =
Single-Sign-On via ActiveDirectory or do not want another web server for =
political reasons.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> How do you deal with that?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Is it still possible to use the old 5.2 adaptors (CGI or ISAPI) =
with modern IIS versions and WO 5.4? How about 64-bit-ness?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Would it be possible to set up WO 5.2 and just replace all the =
frameworks with the 5.4 equivalents so that at least the CGI adaptor =
(WebObjects.exe) from the old version works?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Has Apple ever released the source of the Windows adaptors so that =
they could be recompiled for 64-bit IIS?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Thanks for your input.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Ralph
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>> =
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kieran_lists%40mac.c=
om
>>>>>=20
>>>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>>>>=20
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>> =
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40w=
ebappz.com
>>>>=20
>>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>>>=20
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> =
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/anjo%40krank.net
>>>=20
>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> WebObjects-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk

with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck