Re: ZCA proposal
Martin Aspeli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gary Poster wrote: > On Dec 2, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: > >> Gary Poster wrote: >>> I think I could get fully behind the following proposal that >>> others have made (Shane I think was one of several?). >>> >>> IFoo.adapt(...) >>> >>> IFoo.utility(...) >> I could get behind this too. >> >> We'd need the current IFoo(context, default) for single adaptation >> to continue to work, and I *wouldn't* deprecate it with a warning, >> since it'd just lead to a lot of warnings. We'd obviously also want >> the existing get*() methods to continue to work. > > Not sure which get* you mean (get* and query* in ZCA?) but generally > agree that we are talking about adding, not removing. Sorry, yeah - getMultiAdapter(), getAdapter(), getUtility() and their query equivalents. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )