Re: ZCA proposal
Martin Aspeli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gary Poster wrote: > I think I could get fully behind the following proposal that others have made (Shane I think was one of several?). > > IFoo.adapt(...) > > IFoo.utility(...) Thinking about it a bit, it strikes me that IFoo.adapt(context) may not be right. This reads "IFoo adapt context", which doesn't make sense. What I really want to hear is "context adapted to IFoo". So maybe it's IFoo.adapting(context)? IFoo.adapterFor(context)? IFoo.adapter(context)? Just thinking out loud. Thinking out loud further, I think I may actually prefer IFoo.instance() instead of .utility(), but maybe that debate is already passed. .utility() is OK too. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )