Re: the ZCA API decision
Gary Poster <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Thomas Lotze wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: > >> Thomas Lotze, are you happy enough with this to still help with the >> implementation? > > I am indeed. This isn't the ideal solution I had hoped for, but it is a > big step in a good direction from my point of view and I don't see any > part of it that might take us away from the ideal solution which I still > hope we can implement at some point in the future. > > How are we going to organise the work? Do you intend to sketch out a plan > for action? Should everyone create their own branches and experiment for a > while first? I don't know if too much experimentation is needed for this in particular. I would think we would want to follow the pattern of the adapter_hooks in zope.interface.interface, including the C optimizations. I would be comfortable with you leading the effort, in a shared branch, if that works for you. You could specify what parts you wanted help on. Or would you prefer someone else to take charge? Gary _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )