Re: the ZCA API decision

Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision. Hopefully 
> everybody is at least reasonably happy with this:
> 
> An "adapt()" method will be added to Interface. It takes the objects to 
> adapt as *args, and optional but explicit 'default' and 'name' aguments.
> 
> A "utility()" method will be added to Interface. It takes optional but 
> explicit 'default' and 'name' arguments.
> 
> On the adapter hook (__call__) we will deprecate the implicit second 
> argument for defaults, with a deprecation warning. Instead, we will 
> require people to write out 'default=' explicitly. Otherwise its 
> behavior remains unchanged. I think we can motivate this change purely 
> because IFoo(bar, baz) really is quite surprising compared to IFoo(bar, 
> default=baz).

I tried to follow this discussion closely: however, I cannot say that I 
understand if doing multi-adaptation with IFoo(bar, baz, boo) has been 
rejected or postponed.

> [steering group members, if you are really unhappy with this, please 
> speak up now. Silence is assent. :)]
> 
> Hopefully we can move forward towards implementation.
> 
> Thomas Lotze, are you happy enough with this to still help with the 
> implementation?
> 
> Thanks everybody for your participation in the discussion!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Martijn


-- 
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )