Re: component registry navelgazing
Fabio Tranchitella <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* 2011-06-12 22:49, Chris McDonough wrote: > This seems slightly inconsistent with the adaptation worldview imposed by > getAdapter/queryAdapter. I think it would be more consistent if > "c.queryAdapter(IFoo, foo)" returned foo if foo already implemented IFoo > and there was no other more specific adapter registered for the IFoo/foo > pair in the registry, no? +1, way more consistent than returning None. Regards, Fabio _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )