Re: component registry navelgazing

On 12/06/2011 21:48, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Currently if you ask a registry to singly-adapt an object to an
> interface, and the object you're trying to adapt implements that
> interface, here's what happens:
>
>>>> from zope.component.registry import Components
>>>> c = Components()
>>>> from zope.interface import Interface, implements
>>>> class IFoo(Interface): pass
> ...
>>>> class Foo(object):
> ...     implements(IFoo)
> ...
>>>> foo = Foo()
>>>> c.queryAdapter(IFoo, foo)
> <None>

Looking back in history:

https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-August/032902.html

I guess one or other of us has the parameter order wrong, probably me.

Much thread ensued:
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-August/thread.html#32902
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-September/thread.html#33174

Some justification for keeping the status quo from Fred:

https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-September/033172.html

I stand by my resultant request here:

https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-September/033170.html

Maybe less people care about ZCA now and so we might actually get 
sensible changes made.

Maybe forking would be easier...

cheers,

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )