Re: Current state of Python 3 migration
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20121219183458.GA4517@platonas> |
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 01:07:10PM -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: > On 12/19/2012 11:33 AM, Tres Seaver wrote: > > I spoke in error: the zope.proxy extension is ported. However, there > > is a chunk of 'proxy.h' which is *not* compiled when building the > > extension itself: it is only compiled when included in another > > moduule. That bit needs porting: I will push it out this wee. > > zope.proxy 4.1.0 released with that section Py3k compatible. Note that > the cleanup required (enabling PyCapsule on Python 2.7) requires that > extensions built under Python 2.7 against a 4.0.x version of the > zope.proxy header must be rebuilt. What happens if they're not? Segfault? Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 190 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFQ0gjSkVdEXeem148RAtRSAJ4igyZnfMuZfxWnJCOD+PEEDKm70gCcDvch F6xY6F6YU2blx0Q2yQ7n8xI= =mhFV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----