Re: Re: ANN: Golden Roof AGX Sprint

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Martin Aspeli wrote:

> Especially considering ArchGenXML was a poor name to begin with (it
> didn't generate XML....). Genesis was a great name, maybe it was
> taken?

It's taken by so many projects (and great bands) that it's ok to use
the name. It's not taken by anything plonish.

But got mired a bit in how to name it. Genesis, genexis, genesix,
whatever. And explaining what it does. And that it does the same as
archgenxml.

In the end, we more or less decided to call it 'agx', which we're also
using now because archgenxml is a bit too long to write all the time.

I'd like to see the new agx just as agx (or archgenxml) 2.0. The
internals will be different, but the idea remains the same.

Only thing that's needed: don't use 'agx' by itself to indicate 'the
new agx' :-)

But, "genesis" might be the only way to get rid of the 'archgenxml'
name.

Reinout

-- 
Reinout van Rees                         r.van.rees-1kr/[email protected]
http://vanrees.org/weblog/                  http://zestsoftware.nl/
"Military engineers build missiles. Civil engineers build targets."


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click