Re: RFC: Schema Refactoring, first steps

Rob Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:24:55 -0400, whit wrote:
> 
>> I added rocky's requested clarifications. feel free to add language (or
>> proprosals):
>>
>> https://svn.plone.org/svn/archetypes/proposal/schemaproprosal.txt
> 
> i've read all of this, and, while i agree in general with the design
> sentiments, i'm not quite convinced that it's the right way to go. 
> honestly, my thought is that i'm not sure we should be investing this much
> energy in making AT better.  as you all know from my other posts, i'm
> strongly in support of making the Z3 stuff and the AT stuff both play
> together well within the Plone UI and within the same content objects. 
> but that's specifically so that we can ease the transition off of AT.  i'm
> quite content to change AT just enough so that we can make this happen
> smoothly, and i'm suspicious of any major efforts that go toward improving
> AT rather than toward improving the Z3 story.

+1  Very well put

Daniel



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642