Re: Skins quibble: "Look"
Jean Jordaan <jean-kb4xc5yObU3kQYj/0HfcvhBnub05S5/[email protected]> Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:38:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.design |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> true, i'm sometimes not sure if it's browser cached
Yes, I had to view source to reassure myself.
> it's disabled by default for members - the manager is able
> to change the skin for the whole portal
I enabled " Allow users to select skins", but there's still
only the 2 (default & tableless).
>> Ideally, appearance-type
>> skins shouldn't care what layout skin you're using.
>
> impossible for many many cases -
oh, I realise this <wry grin>. I mainly just want to point
at the fact that, to an end user, a "skin" means choosing a
look (and maybe different layout tech), but to a developer,
it means a stack of layers, some of which belong to aspects
of Plone functionality, some of which belong to 3rd party
products (and which may mush together scripts/templates
which in Plone are seperated into different layers), and
some of which determine looks.
> oslo is really out of date... [...]
> see http://plone.org/development/plips/PLIP11
maybe put up a big notice on the OSLO page pointing at PLIP11?
--
Jean Jordaan
http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
/training <-- Zope/Plone training!
/training/af <-- Nie af nie, Afrikaans.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click