Re: Maybe a PLIP for portlets?

On 2004-05-11 10:19:42 +0200, Mirto Silvio Busico 
<mbusico-+bmjRK/[email protected]> said:

> Can we agree on a standard portlet behaviour?

behaviour in what sense?

> I propose: every portlets returns two parameters:
>     return code (if there is any output or not)
>     portlet string (the content that have to be rendered)
> 
> So it be possible to test if the box have to be rendered or not.

thats a wrong approach imo - it would be a lot cleaner if we would have 
the portlets defined as actions - you could set permissions and 
conditions on it. the only problem: how do you attach them to folders?

joe and me thought we could attach it to the pagelets tool, but 
actually i don't think thats a good idea anymore.

regards, michael
-- 
Michael Zeltner
Netalley Networks LLP
http://www.netalleynetworks.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3