Re: implication of removing portal_skins
Jean-Michel FRANCOIS <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHLexocxfj=KiL2oTaS9X9ZbSvsjautzN4MuzSck-FfRDMaR8A@mail.gmail.com> |
if we want to help addons dev be ready for Plone 5 we must add logs when resources and templates are taken/registred/customized in portal skins in the current Plone version. I have done some tests around. one of the big change is the way we render ski' imgs: usi'g traverse... logo viewlet is broken because we traverse to the img to get the img tag. this is done this way to get width&height. this is bad because this create request to the zodb just for an img tag. this is also the case for all icons in control panels and in many places. Le 3 juil. 2013 20:18, "Nathan Van Gheem" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi all, > > Kim Nguyen is wanting to take up the effort of making sure we fill the > functionality hole correctly when we remove the use of portal_skins in > Plone 5. > > He, and many others, are concerned that doing quick edits on functionality > in plone will become very difficult with the removal of portal_skins. When > managing MANY sites, as he does, being able to do quick edits through the > ZMI is very important to the power of Plone and his deployment. > > Kim created a document with his concerns enumerated and asked me to > respond. I have, and we've now put that document, unlinked, in the > collective developer docs with the idea of the document eventually morphing > into a howto on doing things the "plone 5" way without portal_skins. > > The document is located at: > https://github.com/collective/collective.developermanual/blob/master/source/misc/plone5way.rst > > Warning, my responses are NOT assumed to be the absolute correct response. > These are just things I've thought of right now. Please, if you can explain > things better or know of a better way, modify the responses. > > Also, this is no a place or a discussion of why portal_skins is bad or > wrong for the future of Plone. We've had that discussion, done :) > > > Thanks, > Nathan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Plone-developers mailing list > Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers