Re: setuptools 0.8 and zc.buildout 2.2.0 for Plone

On Monday, July 8, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Rok Garbas wrote:

> Quoting Timo Stollenwerk (2013-07-08 15:35:21)
> > Am 08.07.2013 14:48, schrieb Tom Gross:
> > > Hi list
> > > 
> > > are there any objections to use setuptools 0.8 vs. zc.buildout 2.2.0 for 
> > > Plone 4.3.x onwards?
> > > I moved out of setuptools / distribute hell for some of my own projects 
> > > and it feels great :)
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > I gave zc.buildout 2.1.0 a try some time ago and it worked ok for me.
> > iElectric told me than that it might be a bit too early, so I went back
> > to zc.buildout 1.7.1 because I didn't want to spend time on it in case
> > something goes wrong. What about writing a PLIP for Plone 5?
> > 
> 
> 
> this would be awesome for plone 5, but i wouldn't change it for 4.3.x.
> 
> not even sure if plip is needed for this. if you already tested and it works as
> before and only pinning is needed then we are really not changing our toolset.
> we are just upgrading to latest version for upcoming release. but somebody
> correct me if i'm wrong.
> 

I've already updated the in-progress 5.0 buildout to use 2.1.0. 

We definitely shouldn't be changing any of the 4.x releases to do so though. 

Eric

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
Plone-developers mailing list
Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers