Re: setuptools 0.8 and zc.buildout 2.2.0 for Plone

On 7/8/13 9:52 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
>
> On Monday, July 8, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Rok Garbas wrote:
>
>> Quoting Timo Stollenwerk (2013-07-08 15:35:21)
>>> Am 08.07.2013 14:48, schrieb Tom Gross:
>>>> Hi list
>>>>
>>>> are there any objections to use setuptools 0.8 vs. zc.buildout 
>>>> 2.2.0 for
>>>> Plone 4.3.x onwards?
>>>> I moved out of setuptools / distribute hell for some of my own 
>>>> projects
>>>> and it feels great :)
>>>
>>> I gave zc.buildout 2.1.0 a try some time ago and it worked ok for me.
>>> iElectric told me than that it might be a bit too early, so I went back
>>> to zc.buildout 1.7.1 because I didn't want to spend time on it in case
>>> something goes wrong. What about writing a PLIP for Plone 5?
>>
>> this would be awesome for plone 5, but i wouldn't change it for 4.3.x.
>>
>> not even sure if plip is needed for this. if you already tested and 
>> it works as
>> before and only pinning is needed then we are really not changing our 
>> toolset.
>> we are just upgrading to latest version for upcoming release. but 
>> somebody
>> correct me if i'm wrong.
>>
>
> I've already updated the in-progress 5.0 buildout to use 2.1.0.
>
> We definitely shouldn't be changing any of the 4.x releases to do so 
> though.
>
But we need zc.buildout 2.2.0 in order to go back to using setuptools 
0.8. +1 for doing that for Plone 5.
David

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev