Re: do we need plone.app.customerize? was: [Plone-Users] Insufficient privileges on folder_contents
Nathan Van Gheem <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL8hw9Gbqifa=itEdt1FxyjbkBSWZueU95biNqdGTdaf3_ZxZQ@mail.gmail.com> |
FWIW, it might be worth it posing this question on the plone users list. Hard core developers are not usually the people we are targeting for simple site customizations TTW--we're targeting integrators, themers and newcomers. It's too bad we don't have more consensus on desiring to make the TTW story better--I think it's very important to the success and adoption of plone. On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Dylan Jay <djay-n0pU0XVUApFWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 Dec 2013, at 10:00 am, Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Dylan Jay <djay-n0pU0XVUApFWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: > >> However removing it and skins still leaves us with no core solution for > templates :( > > > > Good! > > > >> We don't really have agreement on a replacement but I think we need > one. zbot is not a TTW solution. > > > > We need less ways to define views, not more. If that means we drop TTW > > solutions, so be it. > > I agree we need the total number of ways to define views to not grow. > However just because you don't have a need for TTW solutions doesn't mean > TTW isn't very important for Plone. > > I've given two talks so far on why we think TTW is very important for > Plone and also why almost all client work we do is now TTW. Rather than > repeat the same arguments again, if you have time, have a quick flip > through the slides or watch the video. > > http://www.slideshare.net/djay/plone-the-open-source-cmsasaservice-platform > http://www.slideshare.net/djay/ttw-ftw-plone-as-the-new-wordpress > > It's for these reasons I think this is a very important discussion and we > need to get the future of defining views TTW right. > IMO it needs to be > - Easy learning curve if you are progressing from diazo > - simple to understand. doesn't require deep understanding of how plone > works. > - allow you to work in almost the same way TTW and in FS. > - be deployable in a theme zip or similar (as well as eggs) > - capable enough that it could replace almost all existing FS template > overrides, views etc so you could almost have a single way of working > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Plone-developers mailing list > Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers > -- Nathan Van Gheem Solutions Architect Wildcard Corp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers