Re: do we need plone.app.customerize? was: [Plone-Users] Insufficient privileges on folder_contents

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Dylan Jay <djay-n0pU0XVUApFWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote:
> On the other hand ZODB gives you
> - instant replication over many servers.

You are on one hand claiming that TTW is needed because the standard
egg-based way of doing things is too complex, and on other other hand
talking about ZODB replication. That doesn't exactly match. ;-) In any
case, replicating a file system is much easier than replicating a
ZODB.

> - Transactional code updates.

Verison control.

> - Memory management of code (All FS code is loaded in RAM all the time. A big problem when you're running hundreds of sites)

So here again you are talking about how eggs are complicated, and at
the same time talking about Python code that apparently is so huge
they create a memory problem. Seriously, if you are able to manage a
site that has so much TTW code that it saves you significant amounts
of memory compared to having it on the disk, then you are able to
learn how to run a buildout.

> - instant code reload

That's definitely a bonus.

> We put all our TTW code in source control. We're trying to make it easier with the development of plone.gitpush
> https://github.com/collective/plone.gitpush

Well, that's already a step forward, away from the traditional TTW model.

//Lennart

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk