Re: Plone 4.3.4, please get your pulls in
Anthony Gerrard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHA8JiRnk0pyPS15Wud8GptyGuA-V4oHmMP_G2fvtd5Y8N+axg@mail.gmail.com> |
On 6 May 2014 12:01, Luca Fabbri <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Anthony Gerrard > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a customer with thousands of existing ATNewItems on a site. I'm > sure > > we'll switch to Dexterity at some point but doing this piecemeal doesn't > > feel like a good idea and doing the full switch to dexterity is not a > > priority right now. > > > > My understanding is plone.app.blob is only used by Archetypes and there > > already is code in p.a.contenttypes that assumes this change gets merged. > > > > If the change can't go in Plone 4.3.x I don't see why we can't have a > > plone.app.blob 1.6.x that goes into Plone 5. Surely we're not saying all > > Archetypes development must stop just because it's becoming optional in > > Plone 5? > > > > I see your point and I agree, but this is still a deep change. > > So I've another idea: why not simply merge a part of the pull request? > We can give to users no upgrade step but only the migration view. So > only users who really want will be able to migrate to blobbed news. > > What you think? Yes agree - that's actually what I suggested a few emails ago :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers