Re: Status of plone.app.multilingual
Asko Soukka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Víctor Fernández de Alba wrote: > I've found use cases when it's useful having several > LIFs (always non-user addable) for several purposes, each interconnected > with their "sister" LIFs. AFAIK it would be an easy change that would > bring more power to the initial sites setups. What do you think? It'd not be trivial, because the current LIF-implementation is very simple. Currently, LIF connection event assumes that all LIFs are the same: https://github.com/plone/plone.app.multilingual/blob/eb45b822535422f93f716a40c8008313b19406d8/src/plone/app/multilingual/content/lif.py And indexing assumes that each LIF has the same contents: https://github.com/plone/plone.app.multilingual/commit/eb45b822535422f93f716a40c8008313b19406d8#diff-e02739c3a57a413771a4fb0ca2655476R59 Cheers, Asko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers