Re: Proposal to manage documentation similar to (or along with) core software.

John Schinnerer <john-/Gao9/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Aloha,

Been following this thread silently...a comment from my docs-user 
testing perspective:
It would be really (really, really) nice to know more clearly and 
immediately and up-front which plone version(s) a doc is both relevant 
to and correct for. I think this is part of the aim with a "release" of 
docs, yes?

And, glad you are making clear that docs will not vanish from other 
access routes just because they are part of a release. I assumed not, 
and, good to see it in cyber-print.

thanks,
John S.


Alex Clark wrote:
> On 2010-04-19, Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello there,
>> We just need a clean UI to make sure people understand that they can 
>> edit and create docs in the KB freely. Limi is working on this.
> 
> Don't get me wrong, I think the KB is great. And if PHC is a good tool to use to 
> create a KB, even better. What I am trying to get people to move towards though
> is a *release*.
> 
> Using the example you pointed me to the other day, you can look at 3 different
> versions of the Django FAQ:
> 
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/faq/
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.0/faq/
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.1/faq/
> 
> And here is another example, versioned installation docs from Zenoss:
> 
> http://community.zenoss.org/community/documentation/official_documentation/installation-guide
> 
> We should be doing the same with Plone's documentation, IMHO.
> 
>> I think there's some confusion in my mind about this point. I'm not sure 
>> if with "doc release" you mean separate docs or just pointing to updated 
>> ones. 
> 
> I mean the documentation included in the release, which could come from
> any number of sources. Just because it makes into a release, does not
> mean it disappears from somewhere else e.g. the KB or Collective docs.
> 
>> In the first case, as said earlier, maintaining all the previous 
>> releases (to fix erratas or add info) can become cumbersome.
> 
> If you view making a release as cumbersome, you are right: it is. 
> Developing and releasing Plone is cumbersome too :-p.
> 
>> I think that, for now, we can just use the appropiate field to indicate 
>> that certain documents apply to Plone 4 and create a collection from 
>> them, or manually link them all (not so many) in a page if needed.
> 
> Right, that is the status quo. If we start *releasing* documentation
> for Plone though, I'd guess the soonest release we could do it with,
> and most likely target is 4.1.
> 
>> Only for new stuff, like existing PLIPs are for new features.
> 
> No, not only for new stuff (documentation), but for a particular 
> release (of existing documentation). A PLIP is an improvement
> proposal and take many forms e.g. adding, removing, restructuring.
> It would probably be pretty easy to mimick the FWT PLIP process,
> or join it.
> 
>> [...]
> 
>> If everybody believes that the figure of a "doc team leader" is 
>> necessary, meaning the one who manages the efforts and levels the field 
>> so everybody can contribute easily, but not the one who writes all the 
>> documentation (which should be written by the developers themselves), 
>> I'd be glad to serve.
> 
> Great! I think that makes you the doc team leader (technically
> release manager, in FWT-speak). Note: I have made this proposal to
> the Foundation board and members and I expect a response, but I'm not 
> going to pursue it. I hope they decide in favor and that you and/or 
> future "documentation release managers" decide to pursue it. 
> But either way, it's been a productive conversation IMHO.
> 
>> Cheers,
>> -- israel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Plone-docs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
> 
> 

-- 
John Schinnerer - M.A., Whole Systems Design
--------------------------------------------
- Eco-Living -
Whole Systems Design Services
People - Place - Learning - Integration
[email protected]
http://eco-living.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.