Re: Proposal to manage documentation similar to (or along with) core software.
John Schinnerer <john-/Gao9/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Aloha, Been following this thread silently...a comment from my docs-user testing perspective: It would be really (really, really) nice to know more clearly and immediately and up-front which plone version(s) a doc is both relevant to and correct for. I think this is part of the aim with a "release" of docs, yes? And, glad you are making clear that docs will not vanish from other access routes just because they are part of a release. I assumed not, and, good to see it in cyber-print. thanks, John S. Alex Clark wrote: > On 2010-04-19, Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello there, >> We just need a clean UI to make sure people understand that they can >> edit and create docs in the KB freely. Limi is working on this. > > Don't get me wrong, I think the KB is great. And if PHC is a good tool to use to > create a KB, even better. What I am trying to get people to move towards though > is a *release*. > > Using the example you pointed me to the other day, you can look at 3 different > versions of the Django FAQ: > > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/faq/ > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.0/faq/ > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.1/faq/ > > And here is another example, versioned installation docs from Zenoss: > > http://community.zenoss.org/community/documentation/official_documentation/installation-guide > > We should be doing the same with Plone's documentation, IMHO. > >> I think there's some confusion in my mind about this point. I'm not sure >> if with "doc release" you mean separate docs or just pointing to updated >> ones. > > I mean the documentation included in the release, which could come from > any number of sources. Just because it makes into a release, does not > mean it disappears from somewhere else e.g. the KB or Collective docs. > >> In the first case, as said earlier, maintaining all the previous >> releases (to fix erratas or add info) can become cumbersome. > > If you view making a release as cumbersome, you are right: it is. > Developing and releasing Plone is cumbersome too :-p. > >> I think that, for now, we can just use the appropiate field to indicate >> that certain documents apply to Plone 4 and create a collection from >> them, or manually link them all (not so many) in a page if needed. > > Right, that is the status quo. If we start *releasing* documentation > for Plone though, I'd guess the soonest release we could do it with, > and most likely target is 4.1. > >> Only for new stuff, like existing PLIPs are for new features. > > No, not only for new stuff (documentation), but for a particular > release (of existing documentation). A PLIP is an improvement > proposal and take many forms e.g. adding, removing, restructuring. > It would probably be pretty easy to mimick the FWT PLIP process, > or join it. > >> [...] > >> If everybody believes that the figure of a "doc team leader" is >> necessary, meaning the one who manages the efforts and levels the field >> so everybody can contribute easily, but not the one who writes all the >> documentation (which should be written by the developers themselves), >> I'd be glad to serve. > > Great! I think that makes you the doc team leader (technically > release manager, in FWT-speak). Note: I have made this proposal to > the Foundation board and members and I expect a response, but I'm not > going to pursue it. I hope they decide in favor and that you and/or > future "documentation release managers" decide to pursue it. > But either way, it's been a productive conversation IMHO. > >> Cheers, >> -- israel >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Plone-docs mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs > > -- John Schinnerer - M.A., Whole Systems Design -------------------------------------------- - Eco-Living - Whole Systems Design Services People - Place - Learning - Integration [email protected] http://eco-living.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Plone-docs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs