Re: Proposal to manage documentation similar to (or along with) core software.

Alex Clark <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation
Organization ACLARK.NET, LLC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Moo,

On 2010-04-19, Mikko Ohtamaa <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is very good idea. 

Thanks!

> However I think the train for Plone 4 has already
> left and it would be more realistic to target with versioned docs to Plone
> 5.

How about 4.1 ? :-)

> E.g.
>
> * Create a place for Plone 5 documentation when the development process is
> kicked off
>
> * Populate this place from docs from plone.org doc area
>
> * Make sure every doc is updated regarding Plone 5 - e.g. a workflow with
> "Plone 5 approved" switch
>
> * Release

Yes! This is close. In particular I like the "create a place" and "populate
from plone.org docs" pieces. Not as sure about the wf piece, though it may
work ok and/or be reasonable.

> ... or ...
>
> * Have a collection, or collection of collections, which will pick up Plone
> 5 docs from docarea mass

Maybe. I tend to shy away when "using Plone" becomes part of the documentation
process, but maybe that's just me.

> Too complex?

Not IMO. I think you got the gist of my points. And I think it's all attainable.

> -----
> Mikko Ohtamaa
> mFabrik - Freedom Delivered.
>
> Web site - http://mfabrik.com
> Mobile site - http://mfabrik.mobi
> Blog - http://blog.mfabrik.com


-- 
Alex Clark · http://aclark.net
Author of Plone 3.3 Site Administration · http://aclark.net/plone-site-admin


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.