Re: Working on the PHC product
Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/08/2010 02:58 AM, Alex Clark wrote: > On 2010-06-07, Israel Saeta Pérez<[email protected]> wrote: >> b) Refactor the whole PHC again, rewriting it from scratch to be as >> light-weight as possible and Plone 4 compatible. The migration could be >> accomplished using transmogrifier. I guess Rok Garbas could help us >> here. This would need several weeks this summer, and lots of testing. >> >> What do you think is best? > > I think a re-factor for PSC/PHC has generally been decided against. Last year some time > I joked about re-writing PSC w/Dexterity types and people said "Yeah!" Then they said > "No! I was kidding, that is insane." Or something to that effect. > > In other words, a refactor would be great, but it's probably too much work. > > So, GO GO GO on the bug fixes! If the refactoring is considered too much work, do we plan to keep patching PSC/PHC in the long term? Or get rid of them at some point, somehow? > FWIW, David Glick mentioned the idea of a plone.org sprint some time this month which > I think is a great idea because I need to get something on the calendar in order to > be able to devote serious time to it. Count me in! -- israel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Plone-docs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs