Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Plone Core?
"Alexander Limi" <limi-z4DKO/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.installers,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Plone Solutions · http://www.plonesolutions.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:33:40 +0100 (CET), Tim Terlegård <[email protected]> wrote: > For what it's worth, I agree with Raphael. To me: > > Plone Core - CMFPlone > Plone Base - CMFPlone, CMFFormController (and other dependencies) > Plone - CMFPlone + all possible products OK. I realize the word "core" has a few connotations since the CMF is using it in a specific way, so maybe Plone Base is better for the minimal install to avoid confusion. (Also remember that a lot of the confusion is because the tarball is called CMFPlone at the moment ;) If the Plone Installer list people (CC-ed) agree, I'll change the relevant documentation and scripts to have the following: CMFPlone - the product directory itself. Plone Base - CMFPlone + dependencies (FormController etc). Plone - Plone Base + any products the installers ship with. Andy, Jim, Simon - is this OK by you? These naming changes would take effect when the 2.1 installers are created. -- __________________________________________________________________ Alexander Limi · Interaction Architect · Plone Solutions Development · Training · Support · http://www.plonesolutions.com __________________________________________________________________ Plone Co-Founder · http://plone.org · Connecting Content ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click