Re: RPMs require RPMs?
Jim Roepcke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.installers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, March 31, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Simon Eisenmann wrote: > Jim Roepcke wrote: > | What's wrong with including a python installation with the Plone > | package? The Mac and Windows installers do it... > | > | The whole "Easy to install" feature falls on its face when you hit > this > | RPM dependency nonsense. > > In general including python inside the plone rpm would be 100% more > work > to provide plone rpms. I even say this will complicate the whole thing > even more since (at least if whole python isnt compiled statically). Oh right, sorry. I forgot about how complicated it is to build stuff on linux and distribute binaries because of version dependencies on libs and stuff. http://ubergeek.tv/article.php?pid=54 ;-) Jim -- Jim Roepcke Tyrell Software Corp <http://www.tyrell.com/> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click