Re: Plone + Squid + SquidTool
"Alexander Limi" <limi-z4DKO/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.installers |
|---|---|
| Organization | Plone Solutions · http://www.plonesolutions.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:45:06 -0600, alan runyan <[email protected]> wrote: > Not to rain on your parade. But this is quite painful to do. > First ESI works with Squid 3. And secondly I've heard > ESI does not work as advertised in the Real World. From Chris' explanations, it seemed to work quite well :) > I would highly suggest *against* this. This is the sort > of configuration information that needs to be explained > to people. Point-and-shoot caching does not exist. > It requires the person who is configuring caching > to understand WTF is happening. Well, I thought this was what the SquidTool would help us achieve, so we could have a sensible default policy for caching, and that the objects invalidated themselves when they were updated. > I believe such an attempt would be quite doomed. > OOTB == lay people. Lay people would not grok > the details of caching. Nope, and neither should they. Just investigating. -- __________________________________________________________________ Alexander Limi · Interaction Architect · Plone Solutions Development · Training · Support · http://www.plonesolutions.com __________________________________________________________________ Plone Co-Founder · http://plone.org · Connecting Content 高联合 · アレクサンダー リミ · 이미짱 · อเล็กซานเดอร์ ลีมิ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/