Re: Plone + Squid + SquidTool
alan runyan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.installers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> Not to rain on your parade. But this is quite painful to do. >> First ESI works with Squid 3. And secondly I've heard >> ESI does not work as advertised in the Real World. > > From Chris' explanations, it seemed to work quite well :) Maybe I heard wrong. >> I would highly suggest *against* this. This is the sort >> of configuration information that needs to be explained >> to people. Point-and-shoot caching does not exist. >> It requires the person who is configuring caching >> to understand WTF is happening. > > Well, I thought this was what the SquidTool would help us achieve, so > we could have a sensible default policy for caching, and that the > objects invalidated themselves when they were updated. > andy's work on the caching_policy_manager configuration is quite nice. but if you want to manually invalidate a object - it does not handle this use case. that is what simon's tool does. >> I believe such an attempt would be quite doomed. >> OOTB == lay people. Lay people would not grok >> the details of caching. > > Nope, and neither should they. Just investigating. > yup. I was not in a good mood when I replied initially. cheers, alan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/