Re: Plone + Squid + SquidTool

alan runyan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.installers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> Not to rain on your parade.  But this is quite painful to do.
>> First ESI works with Squid 3.  And secondly I've heard
>> ESI does not work as advertised in the Real World.
>
> From Chris' explanations, it seemed to work quite well :)

Maybe I heard wrong.

>> I would highly suggest *against* this.  This is the sort
>> of configuration information that needs to be explained
>> to people.  Point-and-shoot caching does not exist.
>> It requires the person who is configuring caching
>> to understand WTF is happening.
>
> Well, I thought this was what the SquidTool would help us achieve, so 
> we could have a sensible default policy for caching, and that the 
> objects invalidated themselves when they were updated.
>

andy's work on the caching_policy_manager configuration is quite nice.  
but if you want
to manually invalidate a object - it does not handle this use case.  
that is what simon's
tool does.

>> I believe such an attempt would be quite doomed.
>> OOTB == lay people.  Lay people would not grok
>> the details of caching.
>
> Nope, and neither should they. Just investigating.
>

yup.

I was not in a good mood when I replied initially.

cheers,
alan



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.