Re: Don't rubberstamp Borat blurbs.

Jean Jordaan <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:41:44 +0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.website
Message-ID <CAJqnznBQhHqSN1DyyKXFBoj7e0+cE5u-zCb6rZDivns8mv+N7g@mail.gmail.com>
> Some of these submissions cannot be rescued by a 'basic grammar check'.

Agreed, send them back to the submitter with a note, it's finally up
to them to polish them properly if they want to be featured on
plone.org

> What has happened to the guidelines that used to be available
> regarding site-, case study- and provider-submissions? I think that
> should be brought back.

I think you're referring to this: http://plone.org/support/content-guidelines
I remember seeing it linked from listings, but didn't see it now when
I had a quick look around.

-- 
jean                                              . .. .... //\\\oo///\\

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Plone-website mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-website
The Wiki: http://plone.org/development/current/projects/WebsiteTeam