Re: Don't rubberstamp Borat blurbs.
Jean Jordaan <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:41:44 +0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.website |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJqnznBQhHqSN1DyyKXFBoj7e0+cE5u-zCb6rZDivns8mv+N7g@mail.gmail.com> |
> Some of these submissions cannot be rescued by a 'basic grammar check'. Agreed, send them back to the submitter with a note, it's finally up to them to polish them properly if they want to be featured on plone.org > What has happened to the guidelines that used to be available > regarding site-, case study- and provider-submissions? I think that > should be brought back. I think you're referring to this: http://plone.org/support/content-guidelines I remember seeing it linked from listings, but didn't see it now when I had a quick look around. -- jean . .. .... //\\\oo///\\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Plone-website mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-website The Wiki: http://plone.org/development/current/projects/WebsiteTeam