Re: Don't rubberstamp Borat blurbs.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Jean Jordaan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Some of these submissions cannot be rescued by a 'basic grammar check'.
>
> Agreed, send them back to the submitter with a note, it's finally up
> to them to polish them properly if they want to be featured on
> plone.org
>
>> What has happened to the guidelines that used to be available
>> regarding site-, case study- and provider-submissions? I think that
>> should be brought back.
>
> I think you're referring to this: http://plone.org/support/content-guidelines
> I remember seeing it linked from listings, but didn't see it now when
> I had a quick look around.
>

Argh, must have been a casuality of the migration to plone.org.  I
will try to bring it back, it is still valid (feel free to expand/edit
if you think it appropriate).

:jon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Plone-website mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-website
The Wiki: http://plone.org/development/current/projects/WebsiteTeam