Re: xslt renderer: 2 questions

Eric Casteleijn wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:

> Hmmm, we should get our stories straight ;) I still think it's
> possible with the current code though. What you would have to do is
> make your own asset type and write an xml-exporter for that that just
> dumps its content. Or am I saying something really stupid?

Yes, if you're willing to write a new content type for each new XML type 
(really shouldn't be an asset; they're not for direct display to the 
user), and associate an XML exporter with each of them, it's possible.

I was assuming that this was undesirable and that a single XML-content 
object would be better. This is also in line with our direction with 
file-assets, where we want them to have different behaviors and UIs 
based on their mimetype, even though the object that stores them is the 
same still.

Regards,

Martijn